Weide, T.L. van der, Dignum, F.P.M., Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Meyer, J-J.Ch. Argumentation About Motivation. In Human Factors Event 2009 (pp. 34-35).
|
Weide, T.L. van der, Dignum, F.P.M., Meyer, J-J.Ch., Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2009). Personality-Based Practical Reasoning. In I. Rahwan & P. Moraitis (Eds.), Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems: Fifth International Workshop, ArgMAS 2008, Estoril, Portugal, May 2008 Revised Selected and Invited Papers Vol. 5384/2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 3-18). Berlin / Heidelberg: Springer.
|
Weide, T.L. van der, Dignum, F.P.M., Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Meyer, J-J.Ch. Practical Reasoning Using Values. In P McBurney, I Rahwan, S Parsons & P Moraitis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2009), Budapest, Hungary (pp. 225-240).
|
Weide, T. van der, Dignum, F.P.M., Meyer, J-J.Ch., Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2009). Practical reasoning using values. Giving meaning to values. In P. McBurney, S. Parsons, I. Rahwan & N. Maudet (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ARGMAS-08) (pp. 225-240, URL =). Barcelona: Huygens Editorial.
|
Weide, T. van der, Dignum, F.P.M., Meyer, J-J.Ch., Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2008). Personality-based practical reasoning. In I. Rahwan & P. Moraitis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems ({ARGMAS}-08) (pp. 76-93).
|
Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2008). Representing causal knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. UU-CS (Int. rep. 2008-24). UU WINFI Informatica en Informatiekunde.
|
Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2008). Representing narrative and testimonial knowledge in sense-making software for crime analysis. In E. Francesconi, G. Sartor & D. Tiscornia (Eds.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. {JURIX 2008}: The Twenty-First Annual Conference Vol. 189. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications (pp. 160-169). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
|
Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2008). The role of compression and refinement in visualization tools for crime analysts. In G. Kanselaar, V. Jonker, P.A. Kirschner & F.J. Prins (Eds.), International Perspectives in the Learning Sciences: Cre8ing a Learning World. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference for the Learning Sciences - {ICLS} 2008 (pp. 3-1443145).
|
Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2008). Utilizing compression and refinement to handle large cases in crime analysis. In F. Grasso, N. Green, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the {ECAI}-06 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument ({CMNA}-06} (pp. 60-67).
|
Braak, S.W. van den, Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2007). AVERs: An argument visualization tool for representing stories about evidence. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 11-15). New York: ACM Press.
|
Bex, F.J., Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H., Verheij, B. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? Law, Probablity and Risk, 6(1-4), 145-168.
|
Bex, F.J., Braak, S.W. van den, Oostendorp, H. van, Prakken, H., Verheij, B. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2007). Sense-making software for crime investigation: how to combine stories and arguments? In M.M. Dastani & E. de Jong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 311-312).
|
Braak, S.W. van den & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). A knowledge representation architecture for the construction of stories based on interpretation and evidence. In F. Grasso, R. Kibble & C. Reed (Eds.), Workshop Notes of the ECAI-2006 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (CMNA VI) (pp. 76-82). Riva del Garda, Italy.
|
Braak, S.W. van den & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). AVER: Argument visualization for evidential reasoning. In T.M. van Engers (Ed.), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference (pp. 151-156). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). An algorithm to compute minimally grounded and admissible defence sets in argument systems. In P.E. Dunne & T.J.M. Bench-Capon (Eds.), Proc. of the First Int. Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA06) (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 144) (pp. 109-129). IOS Press.
|
Bryant, D., Krause, P. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). Argue tuProlog: A Lightweight Argumentation Engine for Agent Applications. In P.E. Dunne & T.J.M. Bench-Capon (Eds.), Proc. of 1st Int. Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA06) (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, 144) (pp. 27-32). IOS Press.
|
Amgoud, L., Bodenstaff, L., Caminada, M., McBurney, S., Prakken, H., Veenen, J. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2006). Final Review and Report on Formal Argumentation System. : ASPIC Consortium.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Lodder, A.R. (2006). GearBi: Towards an online arbitration environment based on the design principles simplicity, awareness, orientation, and timeliness. Artificial Intelligence and Law Journal, 13, 297-321.
|
Chesñevar, C., McGinnis, J., Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C., Simari, G., South, M., Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Willmott, S. (2006). Towards an Argument Interchange Format. The knowledge engineering review, 21, 293-316.
|
Willmott, S., Vreeswijk, G.A.W., Chesñevar, C., South, M., McGinis, J., Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C. & Simari, G. (2006). Towards an Argument Interchange Format for Multiagent Systems. In Proc. of the AAMAS Int. Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS) (pp. 17-34).
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2005). Argumentation in Bayesian Belief Networks. In I. Rahwan, P. Moraitis & C. Reed (Eds.), Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, First International Workshop, ArgMas 2004..
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2005). Direct Connectionistic Methods for Scientific Theory Formation. In R. Festa, A. Aliseda & J. Peijnenburg (Eds.), Cognitive Structures in Scientific Inquiry (Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 84). Amsterdam-New York: Rodopi.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2005). Liberalizing protocols for argumentation in multi-agent systems. In Proc. of the 4th Int. Joint Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 1259-1260). New York, NY, USA: ACM Press.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Hulstijn, J. (2004). A free-format dialogue protocol for multi-party inquiry. In Proc. of the Eighth Int. Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue (Catalog '04) (pp. 273-279).
|
Amgoud, L., Caminada, M., Cayrol, C., Doutre, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Modgil, S., Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2004). Argument-Based Inference. In J. Fox (Ed.), Theoretical Framework for Argumentation (pp. 3-46). ASPIC Consortium.
|
Caminada, M., Doutre, S., Modgil, S., Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2004). Implementations of argument-based inference. In J. Fox (Ed.), Review of Argumentation Technology: State of the Art, Technical and User requirements (pp. 2-13). ASPIC Consortium.
|
Lodder, A.R. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2004). Online Arbitration Services at a Turning Point. , 21-28.
|
Amgoud, L., Caminada, M., Cayrol, C., Doutre, S., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.-C., Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2004). Towards a Consensual Formal Model: inference part. In J. Fox (Ed.), Draft Formal Semantics for Inference and Decision-Making (pp. 1-54). ASPIC Consortium.
|
Dignum, F.P.M. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2004). Towards a testbed for multi-party dialogues. In F. Dignum (Ed.), Advances in Agent Communication Vol. 2922. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 212-230). Heidelberg: Springer.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2003). A Simple Scheme to Structure and Process the Information of Parties in Online Forms of ADR. In A. Lodder (Ed.), Proc. of the ICAIL Int. workshop on Online Dispute Resolution (pp. 87-106). Edinburgh: Vrije Universiteit.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2003). A Simple Scheme to Structure and Process the Information of Parties in Online Forms of ADR (extended version). In ADRonline Monthly Archive. UMASS Center for Information Technology and Dispute Resoluti.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2003). A simple scheme to structure and process the information of parties in online forms of alternative dispute resolution. UU-CS (Ext. rep. 2003-034). Utrecht: Utrecht University: Information and Computing Sciences.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2003). Book Review: Bayesian Artificial Intelligence. In Kevin.D. Ashley, Anja Oskamp, Giovanni Sartor & Arno.R. Lodder (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence and Law (pp. 289-298). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W., Brewka, G. & Prakken, H. (2003). Special Issue on Computational Dialectics: an Introduction. Journal of logic and computation, 13(3), 317-318.
|
Dignum, F.P.M. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2003). Towards a testbed for multi-party dialogues. In M..P/ Huget & F. Dignum (Eds.), Proc. of the AAMAS 2003 Int. workshop on Agent Communication Languages and Conversation Policies (pp. 63-71). Melbourne.
|
Hulstijn, J. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2003). Turntaking: a case for agent-based programming. Utrecht: Utrecht University, Dept. of Computer Science.
|
Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2002). Encoding schemes for a discourse support system for legal argument. In G. Carenini, F. Grasso & C. Reed (Eds.), Proceedings of the ECAI-2002 Workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument (pp. 31-39). Lyon, France.
|
Prakken, H. & Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2002). Logics for defeasible argumentation. In D.M. Gabbay & F. Guenthner (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, 2nd edition, Vol 4 (pp. 219-318). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2001). Eight dialectic benchmarks discussed by two artificial localist disputors. Synthese, 127, 221-253.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2001, November 26). Intelligentie inbouwen in groupware: een goed idee ? RAI, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Symposium: Internet In Business --- Network Event.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2000). Book Review [Book review On Legal Justification and Dialogical Models of Argumentation]. Artificial intelligence and law, 8(2/3), 265-276.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. & Prakken, H. (2000). Credulous and Sceptical Argument Games for Preferred Semantics. In M. Ojeda-Aciego, I.P. de Guzman, G. Brewka & L. Moniz Pereria (Eds.), Proceedings of JELIA'2000, The 7th European Workshop on Logic for Artificial Intelligence (pp. 239-253). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2000, August 22). Keynote address. Humboldt University, Berlin, 3rd Int. Workshop on Computational Dialectics European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI.
|
Vreeswijk, G.A.W. (2000). Representation of Formal Dispute with a Standing Order. Artificial intelligence and law, 8(2/3), 203-230.
|
webmaster@cs.uu.nl,
Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:40:12 +0100
←
Departement Informatica, Universiteit Utrecht